The personal website of Chris Coyier

Archive for May, 2013

Desk = Work; Not Desk = Not Work

Tuesday, May 21st, 2013

I haven’t moved my laptop away from the desk in my new office in my new house in Milwaukee in over a week. When I’m at my desk, I’m working. When I’m not at my desk, I’m not working. It’s never been like this for me before. I can’t tell if some healthy separation is happening, or if it’s just a post-move quirk. I also can’t decide if it’s making my life any better or not, but I think it is.

It’s [Insert Year Here]!

Wednesday, May 15th, 2013

I can’t believe this. It’s 2013! We’re still dealing with this?

Stating the current year is this strange phenomenon in writing. I bet I read it every single day somewhere. I believe it is meant to convey that said problem has been around too long. Or like “it’s the future now and my understanding is that things would be different.” It never reads like that to me though. It reads to me like they are just stating a random fact in the middle of the sentence.

I can’t believe this. Paul Fusco was the voice of ALF! We’re still dealing with this?

Diversity Noob

Thursday, May 2nd, 2013

I recently got an angry email from someone who wasn’t happy that there are more quotes by men on Quotes on Design than there are women. That’s my site, so it feels bad to know I’ve let someone down when all I was trying to do was help.

I need to understand diversity and equality issues more deeply and sort out my own feelings. This site may be a good vessel for that.

If I answer myself completely honestly, I feel that I do no censorship or discrimination against the authors of the quotes I publish on that site. I read the quote, if I think it’s a good quote, I publish it. The site is probably 50% user submissions and 50% me. So questions flow out of me here:

I thought a rational thing to do was to mention this on Twitter and try and solicit more female quotes. I think I even phrased it that way too, which I got in trouble for and I’m not sure why. “Quotes by female authors”. Perhaps that’s better.

Actively soliciting quotes by gender though feels a little sexist to me. Just trying to be honest. Where I tried to exhibit no gender bias before, now I am. But is that for the best? Tab Atkins posted this weird story about this racist tree that seems to resonate here a little. Perhaps over-correcting, even if it doesn’t feel quite right, is for the best. I don’t know.

And then of course diversity and equality isn’t just about men and women. What about latino people and black people and the disabled and short people and the loads of other groups with a past of discrimination? Should I be actively soliciting quotes from these groups as well. That would be more fair, I think, although it becomes more cumbersome, wordy, and may dilute the message. Is it more effective to tackle things group by group?

I also wonder what perfection looks like in the context of Quotes on Design. Should the breakdown of quotes be perfectly representative of the diversity of Earths population? That seems cheezy to say, but perhaps thats the ideal. We can’t say perfectly representative of the tech community, because that suffers from diversity issues already and blaming trickle-down doesn’t help anything. Perhaps fixing this can cause trickle-up and help.

Mostly I just don’t know. I don’t know what to think. I don’t know what to do. I don’t know if I hurt or help. I’ll probably just keep on keeping on and try and do tiny bits of good where I can. If it ever becomes daylight clear that something I’m doing is hurting, I’ll stop it.