<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things I Found Interesting Around February&#160;3rd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/</link>
	<description>web craftsman, blogger, author, speaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:08:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscoyier.net/?p=1685#comment-1521</guid>
		<description>Also, just noticed that the datestamp (time) on these comments is a little out of whack.  Not that it matters all that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, just noticed that the datestamp (time) on these comments is a little out of whack.  Not that it matters all that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscoyier.net/?p=1685#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>Ya, not something I miss all that much - I can always send it to delicious or instapaper (or just star it in reeder) - but, I&#039;ve been using http://www.quixapp.com lately - and it&#039;d be nice to be able to have access to that on occasion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, not something I miss all that much &#8211; I can always send it to delicious or instapaper (or just star it in reeder) &#8211; but, I&#8217;ve been using <a href="http://www.quixapp.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.quixapp.com</a> lately &#8211; and it&#8217;d be nice to be able to have access to that on occasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Coyier</title>
		<link>http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Coyier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscoyier.net/?p=1685#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>Yeah I guess I hadn&#039;t noticed that since the in-app browser is typically totally fine. But if you were into using, for example, Mobile Safari&#039;s bookmarking or something that would be a problem. 

Otherwise I agree, very nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I guess I hadn&#8217;t noticed that since the in-app browser is typically totally fine. But if you were into using, for example, Mobile Safari&#8217;s bookmarking or something that would be a problem. </p>
<p>Otherwise I agree, very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscoyier.net/?p=1685#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>Just figured I&#039;d chime back in here to say that I picked up Reeder, and am pretty impressed.  Doesn&#039;t seem to let me &quot;View in Safari&quot; which seems like an odd omission, but the in-app browser works pretty well most of the time, anyhow.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just figured I&#8217;d chime back in here to say that I picked up Reeder, and am pretty impressed.  Doesn&#8217;t seem to let me &#8220;View in Safari&#8221; which seems like an odd omission, but the in-app browser works pretty well most of the time, anyhow.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscoyier.net/?p=1685#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>Thanks again. Think I will bit the bullet and give it a whirl. Appreciate your thoughts on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again. Think I will bit the bullet and give it a whirl. Appreciate your thoughts on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Coyier</title>
		<link>http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Coyier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscoyier.net/?p=1685#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just starting to use Instapaper and Reeder does have Instapaper support. I&#039;ve been using Reeder all day and so far, I like it better than Byline. Reasons are rather intangible at this point though. Mostly design, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just starting to use Instapaper and Reeder does have Instapaper support. I&#8217;ve been using Reeder all day and so far, I like it better than Byline. Reasons are rather intangible at this point though. Mostly design, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscoyier.net/?p=1685#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>Feed reader is important to me too - I use the browser based one now, so probably anything would be better (or at least faster).  Instapaper support is a must, and add to delicious would be handy - do either of them have the ability to optionally view a page in mobilizer mode (think Instapaper or Readability)?  Thx for getting back to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feed reader is important to me too &#8211; I use the browser based one now, so probably anything would be better (or at least faster).  Instapaper support is a must, and add to delicious would be handy &#8211; do either of them have the ability to optionally view a page in mobilizer mode (think Instapaper or Readability)?  Thx for getting back to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Coyier</title>
		<link>http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Coyier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscoyier.net/?p=1685#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>I just picked it up just now. I&#039;ve been a Byline user for a long time, and it&#039;s pretty nice I think, I just kind feel like my feed reading app is my favorite and most important app on my phone and I want a little innovation there sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just picked it up just now. I&#8217;ve been a Byline user for a long time, and it&#8217;s pretty nice I think, I just kind feel like my feed reading app is my favorite and most important app on my phone and I want a little innovation there sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://chriscoyier.net/2010/02/04/links-for-february-3rd-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscoyier.net/?p=1685#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>Would love to hear more on Reeder.  I&#039;m thinking of picking up either it or Byline, but am on the fence at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would love to hear more on Reeder.  I&#8217;m thinking of picking up either it or Byline, but am on the fence at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

